Terms of Use For FixedByVonnie

By proceeding to access fixedByVonnie.com, you expressly acknowledge, and agree to, all of the following:

fixedByVonnie.com is a personal website and blog owned by Security Plus Pro LLC, which is being presented for informational purposes only. The views on this website are solely those of the website owner (and not those of any employer or of any professional associations affiliated with the website owner).  Any views expressed in this website and any information presented on this website, or in any of its blog entries, should not be relied on for any purpose whatsoever other than as the personal opinions of the website owner.  The website owner expressly disclaims any and all liability for any information presented on this site.  The owner of this website and its blog posts shall not be held liable, and shall be held harmless, for any errors or omissions in any information or representations contained in this website, or in any of its blog entries.  The website owner also expressly disclaims any liability for the current or future availability of any such information. The website owner makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this website or which may be found by following any link on this website. The website owner shall not be held liable for any losses, injuries, damages, claims, or causes of action, from the display or use of any information on this website or in any of its blog entries. If you use the information on this website, or on any of its blog entries, you do so solely at your own risk.

What happened at Microsoft's 2013 Financial Analyst Meeting? - fixedByVonnie

What happened at Microsoft’s 2013 Financial Analyst Meeting?

Microsoft Engineering Panel

Today at 1 pm PT (4 pm ET) at the Meydenbauer Center in Bellevue, Washington, Microsoft held its Financial Analyst Meeting (FAM) to explain its new financial reporting structure to Wall Street analysts.  This years meeting was unique because reporters were strictly proscribed from attending.  Unlike prior FAMs, only Wall Street analysts were invited; however the public did have access via a Microsoft Investor’s relations webcast.

Going into the FAM I had three concerns:

  • Who will replace Steve Ballmer as the new CEO of Microsoft?  What is the CEO search and succession plan?
  • What are the details about Microsoft’s $7.2 billion dollar deal to buy the Nokia handset division?
  • What impact did Microsoft’s reorg have on its financials?

The Microsoft panel comprised Steve Ballmer (CEO), Amy Hood (CFO), Kevin Turner (COO) and Chris Suh (GM Investor Relations).    There was also a motley mix of engineering leaders that included Julie Larson-Green (EVP Devices), Dr. Qi Lu (EVP Applications), Terry Myerson (EVP Operating Systems), Satya Nedella (EVP Cloud), Kirill Tatarinov (EVP Business Solutions) and Tami Reller (EVP Marketing).

Kevin Turner COO Public Cloud

The Lowdown

Here are the highlights from FAM2013:

Amy Hood opened and immediately said Microsoft would provide no update on the CEO succession plan so that pretty much expunged all hope of having my first question answered.

In addition, Office 365 is Microsoft’s biggest money maker.  Office 365 was the fastest growing product in the history of Microsoft with over a $1.5 dollars in revenue last year.  In fact, the Office division takes the largest slice of the product pie at 32%.   Servers & Tools takes the silver medal at 26% and Windows comes in third at 25%.

Clearly, Office is Microsoft’s cash cow and customers are feeding that cow some expensive cud.

As far as the Nokia deal is concerned, Microsoft mentioned it already had an integration executive named and mobilized before the deal so they feel poised to take on the future.

Qi Explaining the Reorg

And then there’s the reorg.

Qi explained that we can divide the reoganization into three sections:

  • Office, the productive suite
  • Communications with Skype and Lync
  • Search Engine suite of products featuring Bing

Qi tried to engender confidence with the investors by clarifying that the leadership team is both strong and well versed with the enterprise workloads.

Near the end of the conference, Balmer corroborated Qi’s sentiments when he said the purpose of the reorganization was “to fundamentally hone the strategy of focusing in on high-value activities”.

My musings…

During the presentation, I kept asking myself:

Did the reorg really put Microsoft in a better position to execute or did just help the executive team work differently?

Is different always better? I don’t know.

It seems like Microsoft reorganized the company to create a new strategy for gaining “speed” in the market (as Balmer put it).  But shouldn’t it be the other way around?  In other words, shouldn’t a companies strategy inform it’s decision to reorganize?  It feels like Microsoft got it backwards.  This is certainly a question I would ask if I were sitting in the crowd.

What do you think of the corporate shake up and Balmer’s impending exit?


Connect with Vonnie on Twitter

Posted in News Tagged with: